Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:A Song of Ass and Fire

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Please do not add mention of pop cultural references, continuity notes, trivia, or who the targets of a given episode's parody are, without accompanying such material with an inline citation of a reliable, published, secondary source. Adding such material without such sources violates Wikipedia's policies pertaining to Verifiability, No Original Research, and Synthesis.

While a primary source (such as the episode itself, or a screencap or clip from it at South Park Studios) is acceptable for material that is merely descriptive, such as the synopsis, it is not enough to cite a primary source for material that constitutes analytic, evaluative or interpretative claims, such as cultural references in works of satire or parody, because in such cases, such claims are being made by the editor. This is called synthesis, which is a form of original research, and is not permitted on Wikipedia, regardless of whether one thinks the meaning of the reference is "obvious". Sources for such claims must be secondary sources in which reliable persons, such as TV critics or reviewers, explicitly mention the reference.

In addition, trivial information that is not salient or relevant enough to be incorporated into the major sections of an article should not be included, per WP:PLOTSUMMARIZE and WP:TRIVIA, and this includes the plot summary. As indicated by WP:TVPLOT, the plot summary is an overview of a work's main events, so avoid any minutiae that is not needed for a reader's understanding of the story's three fundamental elements: plot, characterization and theme. This includes such minutiae as scene-by-scene breakdowns, technical information or detailed explanations of individual gags or lines of dialogue.

If you're new to Wikipedia, please click on the wikilinked policy pages above to familiarize yourself with this site's policies and guidelines.

Saw

[edit]

As a musician, I can tell you the background music in this episode features melodic and rhythmic elements of the main theme of the Saw movie franchise. It's even written in D minor. Why isn't that mentioned anywhere? Does South Park have the permission? If not, that would be copyright infringement. I'm not here to cause any trouble, but it would be interesting why the music resembles the Saw theme.--2.245.187.254 (talk) 22:47, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. Secondary sources (and not primary ones) are required for especially for any material regarding a work of fiction that is evaluative, analytical or interpretive.
How exactly would not including it be copyright infringement? Nightscream (talk) 14:33, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I cannot provide any sources on this topic, so it won't be included in the article. I'm just so desperate that I'm the only one who notices the similarities. South Park would commit copyright infringement if they didn't have the permission from Charlie Clouser.--2.245.84.132 (talk) 21:25, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not if it's used as a form of satire or parody. That's an exception to copyright infringement. It's how publications like Mad magazine can publish parodies of movies and TV shows that closely follow the plot of the original TV show or movie without fearing copyright lawsuits. Nightscream (talk) 22:00, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Japanese Princess that Kenny transmogrifies into, that's a reference to a video arcade game. Can somebody provide the name of that game? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.124.116.101 (talk) 10:28, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on A Song of Ass and Fire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:38, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on A Song of Ass and Fire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:35, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]