Academic Spring is part of WikiProject Open Access, a collaborative attempt at improving the coverage of topics related to Open Access and at improving other articles with the help of materials from Open Access sources. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Open AccessWikipedia:WikiProject Open/Open access task forceTemplate:WikiProject Open AccessOpen access articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Open, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OpenWikipedia:WikiProject OpenTemplate:WikiProject OpenOpen articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
With the recent suicide of Aaron Swartz, this issue has gone mainstream. The analogy with the start of the Arab Spring is compelling. This article needs to be updated to reflect recent events; millions of academic papers being placed in the public domain for free (usually legally). 96.231.130.15 (talk) 12:42, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think that by now it is pretty clear that there is no such thing as an "academic spring" and that this was just a comparison that some pundits made with the Arab Spring. The article mainly consists of a low key re-hash of three other articles on movements that either have reached their goals (and hence obsolete) or have petered out. On the other hand, there is a huge amount of replication between the articles on Elsevier, The Cost of Knowledge, open access, etc. The references are minimal (once those that are from the other articles cited here are removed). As far as I am concerned, all these articles should just simply be redirected to academic journal publishing reform, where all this stuff is being re-hashed one more time and the most-important references should the, of course, be moved there, too. At this point I really see no justification for all these different articles that basically all just repeat each other. --Randykitty (talk) 22:56, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Has there been any mention of an "academic spring" since 2012? Are all things/comments mentioned in this article explicitly stated to be part of this "academic spring"? --Randykitty (talk) 13:07, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]