Talk:Apostasia of 1965

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Apostasia of 1965 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Cold War Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Greece: Politics High‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Politics and politicians task force.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Balkan / European / Cold War Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Balkan military history task force (c. 500–present)
	European military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

European history Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Apostasia of 1965 be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Greece may be able to help!
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Untitled

POV looks like it needs some work. The chronology isn't entirely clear, either. Can you provide a timeline? Also, what exactly happened on October 10? I noticed you listed Apostasia in October 10th's events, but I can't from your article ascertain what happened on that date. Rklawton 00:59, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aspida

There was no reference in the article to the Aspida scandal, which a great deal to do with the political turmoil of the period. It's faulse not to mention these crucial events and, that's why, I intervened. Additionally:

Mitsotakis was not the leader of the "apostates". He was one of the pioneers but not their leader. It is not right and historically accurate to present him in this way. He was accused to be the leader of the "apostates" later, during the '80s, by Andreas for political reasons.

Stefanopoulos, for instance, was, at the period, a much more prominent politician than Mitsotakis.

It is wrong and unfair to say that the Greek Army has or had a right-wing or nationalistic ideology. It is wrong, because: a) There are and there were too many centrists in the army (I do not think that these officers belonged to the exreme right!!!), b) four 2 years the army was led by generals approved by Georgios Papandreou. Were they extremists? Garoufalias wasn't he a centrist? Of course there were righ-wing and nationalistic fractions in the Greek Army but not everybody was like that. Let's not be absolute!
Papandreou was not totally innocent for what happened. Of course, the King's responsibility is huge but the prime minister did nothing wrong? His son was accused to be a member of an appauling conspiracy group inside the army and he insisted to become Defence Minister!!! Isn't this outrageous? And why did he fire Garoufalias, a minister chosen by him, a minister who was his friend, if he wanted the truth to be revealed? And was he a strong politician, since he was changing his mind every time he was meeting Constantine or Andreas?!!! For God shake! Of course, the King acted in an unacceptable way but let's try to be a bit objective and examine the role of all the persons who were involved in this crisis, including the role of Georgios and Andreas Papandreou.

Anyway, my interventions had to do with the respect of the historical accuracy and with my will to introduce some sense of objectivity. Yannismarou 18:21, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What does 'putschist' mean?

What is the meaning of this word as used in the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.146.14.28 (talk) 01:30, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It derives from the German term putsch meaning coup d'état. It denotes a coup d'état participant. Dr.K. 03:21, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Apostasia of 1965. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929110229/http://www.enet.gr/online/online_text/c=110,dt=15.07.2005,id=41084512 to http://www.enet.gr/online/online_text/c=110,dt=15.07.2005,id=41084512

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:10, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Apostasia of 1965. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:37, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]