Talk:Armature (electrical)

Electronics Mid‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electrical engineering Mid‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electrical engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electrical engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electrical engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Electrical engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Electrical engineeringelectrical engineering articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

History of the word?

It would be interesting to have a history of how this word came to be used this way in electric machines. Anyone know of a reference that would shed light on that?Ccrrccrr (talk) 04:43, 3 December 2008 (UTC) yhthhfgyygjgtff ftfuyguyftf yuygyj ftfth tftyd chgvgtt uygyg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.52.153.68 (talk) 12:44, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article needs serious work

This article needs a lot of work, especially in some areas. The two most important things it needs are citations from reliable sources (they should be inline citations), and an expert on the subject who can fix errors and make the article more readable and make certain parts of the article more accessible to people who are new to the subject. -- Kjkolb (talk) 03:37, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Andrewa (talk) 22:00, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It needs more than just that. The introduction of the article describes the armature by saying what it ISNT, and it doesn't even make that very clear. It's "one of the two principal electrical components.... The other component is the magnetic field (magnetic flux) in the air-gap". This definition indicates that the armature is all the tangible parts of a motor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.106.92.10 (talk) 20:08, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why electrical engineering?

Isn't this purely in the realm of mechanical engineering? 199.61.25.254 (talk) 22:02, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Emf?

"... armature coils having no induced emf. " What is emf? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.106.110.73 (talk) 11:06, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Electromotive force. It has been introduced in the lead section. Dalba (talk) 06:20, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

EMF is an obsolete term referring to an analogy between electricity and mechanics which is no longer considered necessary. In the early days of electricity it was imagined that a force exists (perhaps metaphorically) which drives a current around a circuit. This concept has now been replaced by that of 'voltage' or 'potential difference'. It is still useful to distinguish circuit components which can act as sources of electrical energy (such as batteries) from those which can only absorb such energy (such as resistors), but it is a mistake to imagine that the voltages developed across the terminals of these classes of components are in any way distinguishable in kind, or in need of different terminology. g4oep — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.37.54.83 (talk) 08:55, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Probably unsurprising to most, my apprenticeship program still uses this term. Much of how this article was written feels like it came straight out of our National Training Alliance curriculum, which is directed toward electricians in the field and not electrical engineers. 50.34.39.39 (talk) 02:55, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Double-T armature

Early Siemens dynamos used double-T armatures - shape as shown in Brushed DC electric motor - would be nice to mention here and show here and mention triple-T armature as often used in small DC motors. - Rod57 (talk) 13:06, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

armature or wound rotor

Looks more like a wound rotor than an armature to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.194.140.17 (talk) 23:21, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Armature (electrical engineering). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060620081050/http://swigercoil.com:80/upload/newsletter/dcarmature.pdf to http://www.swigercoil.com/upload/newsletter/dcarmature.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:17, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lap winding, wave winding

Looking for illustrations on Commons - I'm not prepared to draw these myself! --Wtshymanski (talk) 19:12, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]