Talk:Aruba at the 2016 Summer Paralympics/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kees08 (talk · contribs) 08:48, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	In May 2015, the National Paralympic Committee of Aruba by Shardea Croes after she came across disability sports during her studies in the United States. - this sentence does not make sense Aruba was one of six countries to make their debut appearance in the Paralympic Games: the others were Congo, Malawi, São Tomé and Príncipe, Somalia, and Togo. Should be semicolon I think The Aruba National Paralympic Committee sent a single short-distance swimmer to the games, Jesus De Marchena Acevedo, who was the flag bearer for the country in the opening ceremony. capitalize Games
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Use trans-title when appropriate
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	Can you somehow verify that this site copied from Wiki? @Kees08: The only evidence is that the link above was Last Revised/Updated in November 2017, whereas the text concerned was composed in September 2008 which can be viewed at the page history of Great Britain at the 2008 Summer Paralympics MWright96 (talk) 16:43, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.

@Kees08: I have taken action on the points you have raised. MWright96 (talk) 09:32, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]