Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Associate in Music, Australia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why I added the "confusing" tag

[edit]

I've wikified and categorized this, but I'm still not sure I completely understand, probably because I don't know much about the Australian educational system. Is this something you get just by taking an exam (which is the impression I get), or is it given as part of/at the end of some course of schoolwork? I think it would help the article a lot if someone out there who knows more about this could make it a little clearer to non-Australian readers. Pinball22 17:16, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yup thats correct. all you do is that you sit an exam and it pretty hard. you play a programme of works and then have a general knowledge quiz

==As someone who has an AMusA qualification in classical guitar I feel the page explains the exam very well and to the point as well. Anyone can take the exam as long as you've prepared the pieces. You can be 9 years old or 90 and don't need prior university education. In fact students can enter themselves into this exam even if they are not studying under a teacher. SOrry I'm not good with Wikipedia so I hope I've added this in the right place. Dream Reverie (talk) 10:58, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest that the "confusing" tag should be removed

[edit]

I have to disagree about the article itself. As an Australian but not a musician, my view is that the article explains the subject very well.

It is not the job of the article to explain the structure of the arts education system in Australian.

I proposed to remove the "confusing" tag in approx 1 week unless further discussion occurs. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thesman123 (talkcontribs) 08:26, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Associate in Music, Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:33, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Bit Over The Top

[edit]

The "prestigious award, equivalent to achieving an undergraduate tertiary qualification in Music" is a bit strong. I hold an AMusA diploma and while it is a useful measure of one's ability in things like instrumental performance, I do not believe it is anything like as valued as a degree in music. These days heaps of kids complete it while still in high school. JimBreen (talk) 01:57, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with this comment. Even in AMEB's own websites I don't see them equating their AMusA diploma to any official qualification. I am curious if anyone actually knows the official equivalent qualification for these diplomas, or if they are even recognised. Would the LMusA diploma be a better equivalent to an undergraduate tertiary qualification in music? 202.86.119.146 (talk) 07:20, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]