Talk:Battle of Cochin

Portugal Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

See Requested articles

Assess

Help assessing articles.

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this list — Edit this list

India: Kerala Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kerala (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Military history: Asian / South Asia / Early Modern

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

MILHIST initial assessment

Despite extensive citations, they are incomplete and two different styles are in use(in text and inline). So can only be start class but could easily go to B and beyond if this were addressedMonstrelet (talk) 13:32, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you explain a little more clearly what you mean?, e.g. with some examples. Not challenging your assessment, just seeking guidelines as how to improve it. Walrasiad (talk) 13:36, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References

I have made a massive removal of citations as they fails to follow WP:RAJ. The only sources that can be usable according to this is:

1.) Mathew, K.S. (1997) "Indian Naval Encounters with the Portuguese: Strengths and weaknesses", in Kurup, editor, India's Naval Traditions, New Delhi: Northern Book Centre. Monteiro, S. (1989) Batalhas e Combates da Marinha Portuguesa, Vol. 1 (1139–1521) Lisbon: Sa da Costa.

I am not sure if they are reliable sources. Please add suitable references. Most of the paragraphs are existing since a long time without even being cited by a source. Ajayraj890 (talk) 09:55, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Walrasiad, issue is commented above. The references falls under WP:RAJ, WP:AGEMATTERS and WP:PRIMARY (need to confirm). Provide reliable and modern sources. Imperial ^[AFCND] 18:36, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RAJ goes to a user page. Not sure what that is.

Unfortunately, this area tends to be under-researched, so there are hardly any modern works on them. These well-known works are the only references to these events. They are meticulously referenced, and can be accessed directly by any reader for verification. Please don't delete them. Walrasiad (talk) 18:44, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Sitush here. Imperial ^[AFCND] 19:05, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The RAJ page (and WP:HISTRS) are both widely accepted. Furthermore, the RAJ page links to specific examoples demonstrating the community consensus for not using such old sources. That consensus has been around for a long time, supported at venues such as WP:RSN and WT:INB. Thus, it's a bit more than a "user page". - Sitush (talk) 15:13, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this whole article written by an ESL?

The broken English and conversational idioms are in every single paragraph. 222.102.37.190 (talk) 12:32, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Missing info on the infobox

The infobox is incomplete, it necessitates a casualities section and a forces section Antiparcialidade (talk) 21:01, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the part is unsourced. That's the primary issue the article have. Imperial ^[AFCND] 07:54, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]