Talk:Battle of Crete order of battle

Military history: South Pacific / British / European / German / Italian / World War II CL‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

CL

This article has been rated as CL-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)
	World War II task force

Greece Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

HMS Ajax

This famous ship is not mentioned here. However, I do know that a number of soldiers were rescued at Crete by HMS Ajax. Did it just decide to come there by itself? Wallie 10:59, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HMAS Napier

I note this ship (destroyer) is not mentioned in the text also, but know that it made two successful evacuations of allied troops from Sfakia, one on 28 May 1941 and one on 30th May (from my family history - father was one of troops rescued) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.139.41.254 (talk) 21:07, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

General Order of Battle

Despite its first line, the oob is not complete. These two webpages provide extra info on defenders (especially tank and artillery strength):

Luftflotte IV

While the Luftwaffe did eventually gain a Panzer Division, I doubt that Luftflotte IV ever controlled the 5th Panzer Division, or even the 6th Gebirgs Division!Glevum (talk) 05:22, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kampfgeschwader 26

Curious about the best way to add Kampfgeschwader 26 to the oob. The Kampfgeschwader 26 wiki page shows that it participated in the Battle of Crete, and it was likely part of VIII. Fliegerkorps. Just trying to find a decent reference to clearly show the connection Bertdeb (talk) 02:02, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Battle of Crete order of battle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303232218/http://www.ra39-45.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/coast/page13.html to http://www.ra39-45.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/coast/page13.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.regiments.org/regiments/uk/volmil-london/vinf/L12rangr.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ian.a.paterson.btinternet.co.uk/orgartillery.htm#RHA102
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.regiments.org/regiments/uk/volmil-england/vcav/northumb.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.regiments.org/regiments/uk/volmil-england/vcav/lancH.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080929033621/http://www.defence.gov.au:80/army/ahu/books_articles/Articles/Matilda_Tanks.htm to http://www.defence.gov.au/army/ahu/books_articles/Articles/Matilda_Tanks.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:08, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Crete order of battle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050818181104/http://crete-1941.org.uk/ to http://www.crete-1941.org.uk/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.defence.gov.au/army/ahu/books_articles/Articles/Matilda_Tanks.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:22, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Perivolians

I believe there is confusion between the New Zealand and British composite battalions. The source cited (https://www.awm.gov.au/collection/RCDIG1070149) seems to think that the New Zealand composite battalion was called the Royal Perivolians, but the NZ official history does not mention this. Furthermore the order of battle given by the NZ official history lists the Royal Perivolians as a separate unit formed from various British units (http://nzetc.victoria.ac.nz/tm/scholarly/tei-WH2Cret-b4.html). Other orders of battle appear to be in agreement with this (http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/battles_crete.html, http://homepages.force9.net/rothwell/crete.htm). Stanley Bannerman (talk) 12:57, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]