Talk:Battle of Khresili

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Asian / Ottoman / Early Modern

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Ottoman military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

Georgia (country) Mid‑importance

	Georgia (country) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (country), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Georgia and Georgians on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (country)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (country)Template:WikiProject Georgia (country)Georgia (country) articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
	This article lacks sufficient references and adequate inline citations. Once the references are added, please remove the `\|unref=` parameter from this template.

Peacock tag

Mr. Guye, can you elaborate on your addition of the {{Peacock}} tag on the article? There is no |reason= param explaining what WP:Peacock terms you were worried about. If it's decisive, that is a standard (non-puffery) word used to describe certain battles, which is fully appropriate when sources describe it thus. I'm considering removing the template. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 00:30, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mathglot: I suppose I should have added {{essay-like}} or {{pov}} instead of peacock, because the problem is far more extensive than a few adjectives. The article overall seems to play up the importance of the battle and overall paint a pro-Georgian narrative. For example:

The importance of battle of Khresili is often misunderstood and underestimated.
The battle of Khresili was a Georgian reconquista
and the only remnant of past Ottoman glory in this treaty was an annual tribute of 60 women (of any ethnic origin, not necessarily Georgians), which king Solomon failed to honor anyway.
This marked the end of two centuries of Turkish influence in Western Georgia, during which kingdom of Imereti was a vassal of Ottoman Empire.

None of this is cited or attributed to any author. There are more instances like that too. It just seems like the whole article seems to be more about pushing a narrative than recounting a series of events. It would be one thing if it was backed up by cited quotes from respected scholars, but it isn't. See articles like Battle of Kapetron and Siege of Krujë (1450) for good examples of articles about battles. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 21:19, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mr. Guye: Thanks. Indeed, I noticed both #1 and #2 above almost immediately. I would probably have done something about it shortly after posting my comment here, only as I started to investigate to see what to do about it, I realized it was only the tip of the iceberg of a huge problem at this article, and decided that incremental changes to fix those two (and other similar) was a bit like sweeping the deck on the Titanic. (But they should probably be fixed anyway, pending other, bigger changes.) Mathglot (talk) 21:42, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Flag of Abkhazia (18th century).svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:07, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]