Talk:Battle of Roslin

Middle Ages Mid‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: British / European / Medieval Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Scotland Mid‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is obscene

The largest army that England sent north during the 1st Scottish War of Independence was around 21,000 for Bannockburn, followed by around 15,000 for Stirling Bridge. The idea that 30,000 men were at Roslin is just nonsense. The size of the Scottish force is also incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AyrshireNeil (talk • contribs) 10:06, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

30,000?

30,000 is the number given in the campaign box, yet the article says only a few hundred took part? I seriouly doubt that there were 30,000 troops sent by the English. The combined forces of Englan could not number 30,000.Tourskin 02:09, 21 April 2007 (UTC) You are absolutely right, very few medieval English armies were anything like as strong as 30,000. The English force seems to have been gathered from the garrison of Berwick and the gentry and aristocracy of N. England and such Scots as were in English allegiance - rather few in 1302-3. The account of a great battle with 30,000 English and 8,000 Scots is a complete fabrication and is totally contrary to all of the contemporary material. Likewise claims that command of the Scots passed to Sir John Comyn (or to Sinclair) because Sir WIlliam Wallace declined the post are unsupportable. John Comyn was the Guardian (regent) of Scotland for King John, a post that Wallace held in 1297-8.[reply]

It was not 30,000

Supposedly it was 3 separate armies of 10,000 that converged —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.254.219.191 (talk) 10:35, 26 February 2009 (UTC) but there is no trace of these armies in the sources of the day. An editor has chosen to write an entry based entirely on Bower's completely fabricated account of the battle, written more than a century after the event. there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever to suggest a battle between enormouse armies, nor that William wallace was considered for the role of commander.I have,therefore, replaced that account with a short piece based on what we know from contemporary and near-contemporary evidence. If any material - other than Bower's - can be produced I would be very happy to see it included. Chris Brown. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.152.110.125 (talk) 11:31, 8 January 2010 (UTC) I have endeavoured to remove a lengthy, but quite spurious account of battle which is derived from Bower's account. Bower essentailly invented a large battle for propaganda purposes. We know from record material that no great English or Scottish army was raised that February and that the forces engaged in a modest, though politcally significant action - the size of a medieval battle is often not a useful guide to its importance. There is no value to be gained from keeping Bower's highly romanticised account on the main page unless someone can provide a compelling reason to the contrary which has a firm basis in early 14th C. evidence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.159.182.136 (talk) 15:24, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copy and pasting of article

The article for the Battle of Roslin is almost wholly copy and pasted from http://www.roslinbiocentre.com/location/the-battle-of-rosslyn. As such there may be issues of copyright violation, plagiarism and source reliability.77.103.95.102 (talk) 16:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Condense article

In view of the problems which people have identified above, I propose to substantially condense it mainly to whatever can be gleaned from Peter Traquair's account, which I think is a reliable source. PatGallacher (talk)

Wikipedia on the battle in article on Segrave

This is what Wikipedia says of the battle in the article on Segrave. "On the first Sunday in Lent 1303 Segrave, with his followers dispersed, was suddenly attacked when near Edinburgh by some Scots in ambush, severely wounded, and taken prisoner with twenty other knights. He was, however, subsequently recaptured by the other portions of his army who had escaped the earlier surprise." 82.37.141.26 (talk) 15:55, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We can hardly take a work published in 1695 as a reliable source, when more recent scholarship contradicts this. PatGallacher (talk) 17:16, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

An IP user is engaging in an edit war on this article, by attempting to change it in a way which does not reflect recent scholarship, which is that this was not a particularly large battle. PatGallacher (talk) 19:41, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fraud

This article has recently been the subject of some downright fraudulent editing, attributing e.g. figures for the size of the armies to Traquair pages 110-111. I have checked these pages in this book and there is nothing about this. PatGallacher (talk) 15:07, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]