Talk:Battlestar Galactica: The Second Coming

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Television: Battlestar Galactica Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Battlestar Galactica task force (assessed as Top-importance).

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Science Fiction Mid‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

And the question still remains.

Has anyone else out there seen the trailer recently?

Richard Hatch shows the trailer only at conventions he attends. His reasoning, prior to the new series coming out, was that as he was trying to use it to gain studio support for the project, he did not allow it to be downloadable over the net in order to keep the look of it professional. --BlueSquadronRaven 00:28, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not only to keep it professional, but also to keep Universal off his back legally. As long as he doesn't make a dime and doesn't let it leak out, they probably agreed to look the other way.

The trailer is readily available these days on YouTube.Wyldstaar (talk) 00:40, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The neutrality of this article is disputed?

There is a 'The neutrality of this article is disputed' tag on the article. What's the dispute? I came to this talk page and I don't see anything about it. A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 19:09, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't add the tag, but I presume the tag's there because the article appears to take sides. The bigger issue is that it has no citations at all. Xihr 20:51, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uhm, it seems from the edit history that you did add the POV tag. [1] Oh well, since no-one is interested in explaining why the tag was placed I'm going to remove it. AlistairMcMillan (talk) 23:09, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of WP:BLP violation

Possibly related to the above, there was an unsourced statement regarding Hatch's finances with regards to this production. Without a reputable source, this statement is totally unacceptable under the WP:BLP policy and I have removed it from the article. Note that under the policies WP:RS and WP:NOR even if Hatch made such a comment at one of the showings, we can't use that as a source. There has to be a magazine or book reference, or a reference on a reputable website (for now Wikipedia does not accept most blogs as RS) in order for such information to be cited here. 23skidoo (talk) 14:56, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]