Talk:Bengal slow loris

Bengal slow loris has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 23, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 12, 2011.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Bengal Slow Loris (pictured) is found in numerous protected areas, yet is still threatened by poaching and illegal logging?

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bengal slow loris article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Primates Low‑importance

	Primates portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Primates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Primates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PrimatesWikipedia:WikiProject PrimatesTemplate:WikiProject PrimatesPrimate articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Asia: Southeast Asia / India Low‑importance

	Asia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Southeast Asia (assessed as Low-importance).
	India portal This article is supported by WikiProject India (assessed as Low-importance).

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bengal Slow Loris/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ucucha 04:41, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You've got to be fast... I'm claiming this review now, and will be offering comments tomorrow or within a few days. Ucucha 04:41, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, one for today: "N. bengalensis is considered the least well-known of the five slow loris species". I can't find this in the source cited, and it sounds unlikely to me (do we really know less about this relatively widespread species than about N. pygmaeus or N. menagensis?). Ucucha 04:50, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~This statement was here when I started working on the article, do you know where it's from, VH? Sasata (talk) 15:38, 21 January 2011 (UTC)~~[reply]

(Red-faced) Seems that I added this statement in... that's what you get when a fungus-guy writes about mammals.... removed. Sasata (talk) 16:38, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~Explain "brachial gland" in lead.~~

Glossed definition. Sasata (talk) 15:38, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~How does this species differ from N. coucang? Groves (2001) almost certainly covers this.~~

Added a little bit from Groves, but this could be expanded and made made into a subsection "Similar species". Sasata (talk) 15:38, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure the taxonomy section will be entirely clear to a lay reader.

I'll work on this. Sasata (talk) 15:38, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I gave it a go. Does it sound better now? Sasata (talk) 02:54, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~The "Distribution" section says it occurs in the Garo Hills in Bangladesh, but Garo Hills says the hills are located in Meghalaya, India.~~

I think that's an error in the original source. I've removed the mention of Garo Hills, as the paragraph previously indicates that it's in Meghalaya, India (where the Garo Hills are located). Sasata (talk) 16:26, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps expand the "Distribution" section to include information about the places where its range meets that of related species (i.e., N. pygmaeus in Cambodia and southern Vietnam and N. coucang around the Isthmus of Kra).
I'm not sure if I've seen any sources discuss this. I'd be glad to include this information, as long as it doesn't violate WP:SYNTH. The CITES PDF details the distribution of both species you mention, but it focuses on all three species individually. I've found a few other freely available sources that don't appear to be included in the article through Google Scholar, so we'll see if that turns up anything... – VisionHolder « talk » 01:10, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Pan et al. (2007) has some relevant discussion; Groves (2001) probably has too. Ucucha 01:22, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have access to neither. Would someone mind sending me the digital copies if available? – VisionHolder « talk » 01:30, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sent. Sasata (talk) 02:12, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Requested material added from Pan et al. 2007. – VisionHolder « talk » 02:39, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
~~Lead says middle-class women use it; body says wealthy to middle-class~~

Added wealthy to lead. Sasata (talk) 15:38, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In ref. 21 (Red List account), italicize "Nycticebus bengalensis" and de-italicize "Version 2010.4"

Italics added, the version italics is a template issue... so I'll let VH get that. Sasata (talk) 15:38, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of which IUCN template is used, it puts the "version" in the {{cite web}} parameter "work", which automatically italicizes it. In other words, this appears to be the "proper formatting" for a web citation. – VisionHolder « talk » 23:52, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of the underlying templates, I don't see any good reason to italicize the version. However, there is of course no GA criterion about italicizing references, so I won't hold up the GAN on this issue. Ucucha 23:58, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

True... one of the catches of using templates. However, given that numerous biota articles have passed FAC using these same IUCN templates, I guess it's best to just let it slide for now. If someone finds a better way to do this, I'll be fine with the change. – VisionHolder « talk » 00:09, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ucucha 14:51, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the fixes; I'll pass the article now. Ucucha 18:59, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Potential sources

I'm starting a list (below) for potential sources that still need to be reviewed/incorporated before a FAC run. – VisionHolder « talk » 09:04, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bengal slow loris. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cites.org/eng/notif/2006/E052.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.djmt.nl/cgi/t/text/get-pdf?idno=m7603a04;c=ctz
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110727185114/http://www.primate-sg.org/PDF/APJ1.1.bengalensis.pdf to http://www.primate-sg.org/PDF/APJ1.1.bengalensis.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:58, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bengal slow loris. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cites.org/eng/notif/2006/E052.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120303214230/http://www.primate-sg.org/PDF/APJ1.2.LorisIndia.pdf to http://www.primate-sg.org/PDF/APJ1.2.LorisIndia.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.djmt.nl/cgi/t/text/get-pdf?idno=m7603a04%3Bc%3Dctz

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:41, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]