Talk:Bennett's tree-kangaroo

Mammals: Monotremes and Marsupials Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Monotremes and Marsupials (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Queensland / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Bennett's tree-kangaroo is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

2006 comments

I have used the status classification of "secure" rather than the earlier "near threatened" status recorded for this species by the IUCN. This is based on the opinions of both by Roger Martin and Lewis Roberts, two of the world's top experts on this species. Since Aboriginal people have stopped hunting them, and the major part of the range of this Tree-kangaroo is now protected under World Heritage legislation, the numbers seem to be increasing and they are expanding their range. For example, a dead specimen was found just recently along Amos Bay Road, just south of Cooktown. John Hill 01:16, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is standard to use IUCN for all WP:TOL articles. You can add Martin's updated information into the text of the article, but leave the taxobox with the official status until that gets changed. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:20, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! I reverted the taxobox to how it was before I changed it some time ago. Do please have a look at what I have written about the conservation status and let me know if you still have any qualms. Best wishes, John Hill 01:44, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed

I have just added a Footnotes section and rearranged the references. We still need page numbers for a couple of the references and also someone to add the range area on the map - unfortunately, I am not in a position to do either. Can anyone help, please? Season's greetings, John Hill (talk) 22:22, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bennett's tree-kangaroo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070107065108/http://wettropics.gov.au:80/pa/pa_tree_kanga.html to http://www.wettropics.gov.au/pa/pa_tree_kanga.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.}

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:08, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]