Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk (UK Parliament constituency)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:58, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A bit presumptuous ...

[edit]

... of the LibDems [I assume] to suggest that there will be another election before 2020 and to get ahead of the crowd by naming their candidate. She is only a\ Prospective Parliamentary cndidate. I don't think it is appropriate to put up an election table at this point and list candidates. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.18.108.90 (talk) 22:01, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree until an election is called in the Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk constituency there should be no additional election box on this article. Brythones (talk) 16:59, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I try to locate and delete Next election candidate tables as swiftly as possible. They break Wikipedia policy (see UNDUE, CRYSTAL and NOTBLOG for starters). There is also an argument that they break electoral law, too. Anyway, if a box appears here again, delete it, cite policy, and perhaps let the editor know using policy citations. doktorb wordsdeeds 17:28, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Graph

[edit]

I am not sure the graph that is included here is terribly useful as prior to 2005 it focuses on predecessor seats for the Berwickshire part of the constituency only, including Berwick and East Lothian, which bears little resemblance to the current Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk seat and was of a very different political character being a Conservative/Labour marginal for most of its existence (1950-1983). Indeed in the 1960s the Liberals held Roxburgh, Selkirk and Peebles, which is arguably the main predecessor of the current seat), but did not even contest Berwick and East Lothian. If someone was looking at the graph and assuming it always relates to the area covered by the current seat, then they would get a totally misleading impression of its political history. Dunarc (talk) 20:54, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]