Talk:Bonzo Goes to Bitburg

Joey "previously a Reagan admirer"?

No citation was provided for this claim, it did not say this in MJ, as implied. I doubt it he was very well known for being liberal and very few NY Jews were pro-Reagan especially in 1984. I will delete the phrase in a few days if no citation is given.

Lenbrazil (talk) 01:51, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Link to Mother Jones article

I'm too un Wiki-savvy to figure out how to add it http://books.google.com/books?id=n-cDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PT11&lpg=PT11&dq=%22sort+of+shit+on+everybody.%22&source=bl&ots=4xFERSkOn_&sig=XL04Zap0JwG-kplPY0pgtQcYu40&hl=pt-BR&ei=SLMsTeavI4GBlAfb0MSbCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CB8Q6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=%22sort%20of%20shit%20on%20everybody.%22&f=false

Lenbrazil (talk) 02:04, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So were there American soldiers buried in the cemetary or not?

(MrDeBeuker 11:00, 2 February 2006 (UTC))[reply]

==No, Americans were not buried there. Nazi soldiers, who committed atrocities against American soldiers [and plenty of others] are buried there, and this why Joey objected to Reagan's visit.ROG 19 19:47, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ramones Bonzogoestobitburg12inchcover.jpg

Image:Ramones Bonzogoestobitburg12inchcover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Bonzo Goes to Bitburg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081223132852/http://www.rollingstone.com:80/artists/theramones/albums/album/323069/review/5941801/animal_boy to http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/theramones/albums/album/323069/review/5941801/animal_boy

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:54, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Waffen-SS casualties

These numbers come from an extreme-right publisher & a (sort-of) neo-Nazi organisation, and are generally irrelevant. The casualty rates among the Waffen-SS formations were about the same as in the armoured formations of the Army (land forces of the Wehrmacht). Preserving here by providing this link diff. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:31, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bonzo Goes to Bitburg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080220212216/http://archive.salon.com/ent/music/feature/2001/04/15/joey/ to http://archive.salon.com/ent/music/feature/2001/04/15/joey/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:06, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]