Talk:Bretylium

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Bretylium.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Fuse

Ran into Bretylium for the treatment of ventricular fibrillation, didn't see any advantage of its existance. Most information there ought to be fused here. --Bobjgalindo (talk) 20:33, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, looks like the other page was created as a school project or something, should be shortened and moved here. 69.143.35.117 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:22, 28 February 2012 (UTC).[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Bretylium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060904052937/http://www2.kumc.edu/wichita/meded/intro/modules/ami/reading/RAMI-09.htm to http://www2.kumc.edu/wichita/meded/intro/modules/ami/reading/RAMI-09.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:59, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]