Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Brijuni

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

untitled

[edit]

This page should be renamed.

http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Brionian_Islands

Yes, but modern English usage is Brijuni. GregorB (talk) 16:49, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, it's not. These islands are called the Brioni if they are called anything in English. 64.191.211.54 (talk) 13:29, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Google says otherwise:
I've added "Istria" because "brioni" does not always refer to the islands, and I've excluded Croatian web sites. I'm not really privy to the workings of the English language, all I can do is invoke the Google test. Bbc.co.uk slightly prefers Brijuni to Brioni (3 to 1 in valid hits). Nothing on cnn.com. Britannica says "Brioni (Brijuni)"[1], though. GregorB (talk) 14:55, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The name was always Brioni, in Venetian, Austrian, Italian time and when Tito was here. 1991 after the war, Croatians destroyed all, what remembered to that time, because Tito was friend of Serbia. They didn't like anymore Serbo-Croatian language, changed all in a sort of Old-Croatian. Names of ships, vilas, streets, isles, many names in the hotel... It was not good for tourism, because everybody connected Brioni with Tito. Klio (talk) 17:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating the redirest that leads to this page for discussion/deletion. It is no longer possible to reach the article on Brioni (an Italian fashion house founded in 1945) except through Google Cache.Bobzchemist (talk) 21:44, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of fighing about the name, you better should update the page. Many things are completely outdated (like the animal species of the safari park), and not a single line about the recent struggles "national park versus touristic development". I can't do it, I don't have sources, I just noticed it after having visited the island and could not see it in this article 47.68.232.114 (talk) 16:05, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Brijuni. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:04, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brijuni. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:35, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]