Jump to content

Talk:Bruford (band)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Why do we have this page when there is already a "bill Bruford" page? - it's particularly confusing as of course Bill's son Alex is also a professional musician with Infadels (Wall of Sound)

"Bruford" was a band led by Bill Bruford, one of several bands he was a part of. While Bill clearly led the band, he made it clear that others were equal members in the project. It's analogous to having pages for both Van Halen and Eddie Van Halen. --dm (talk) 15:49, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


I have moved all the information to "Bill Bruford", so... I think this page should be deleted.

andreasegde 13:40, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I respectfully disagree. Each of Bill Bruford's bands — including Bruford — should and do have their own WP pages. Rather than deleting this page, why not expand it to include more info not on the Bill Bruford page. —D. Monack talk 03:41, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
My opinion is the same as D. Monack's - please consider that Wikipedia is not limited the same way a book is, so, in my opinion, there is no need to merge articles via redirects except when it's harmless, such as in case of alternative spellings or misspellings. Note that the Wikipedia:Redirect page says a valid purpose of redirection is "Sub-topics or other topics which are described or listed within a wider article. (Such redirects are often targeted to a particular section of the article.)". I would argue that this point is wrong in many cases; instead of creating redirects for short articles like this one, why not expand it as D. Monack proposes? Also, please note that bands that share the name with a leading member of the band are not uncommon, as for instance Bon Jovi, Pat Metheny Group, Chase, and plenty others. --2.110.114.86 (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bruford (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:59, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]