Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Bruriah

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The seduction and suicide of Beruriah?

[edit]

I believe that this story is not actually in the Talmud, but rather is in medieval commentaries that date from centuries later. Rashi mentions the story. By that time, Beruriah had become something of a legend. The stories that circulated about her in the Middle Ages have more the flavor of Medieval France than of the Talmudic period. These stores were, in effect, a way of questioning the wisdom and propriety of letting a woman become educated. I notice that some contemporary commentaries about her simply omit this material, apparently because it was nothing more than a scandalous legend that served a purpose at a later time in history. --Metzenberg 23:00, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's been suggested that certain more embarrassing stories were edited out of the Talmud during the Geonic period (can't remember where I saw it). I would hardly think Rashi made it up, more likely he had the text of some medrash. And there are numerous women mentioned in the Talmud in some capacity as a sage just usually not by name (again can't remember of hand but try the end of the sixth perek of Brachot).Wolf2191 01:23, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification, please.

[edit]

"But Rabeinu Nissim Ben Yakov of Kairouan brings on a different explanation that is closer to the text." ---
Closer to what text? Zerotalk 09:52, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One of several?

[edit]

The lead says that "Bruriah is one of several women quoted as a sage in the Talmud", but the Brooklyn Museum says that Bruriah is the only woman mentioned in the Talmud as a sage.[1] Which one is correct? Kaldari (talk) 03:09, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bruriah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:17, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any External links apart from references. It would if #4 linked to a site. Mcljlm (talk) 16:43, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:40, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]