Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Bulkley Valley-Stikine

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Demographics

[edit]

I like what you did here. The change in population from last census should be sufficient to give a view of the recent fluctuation in population of the riding. DoubleBlue (Talk) 19:39, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Election results

[edit]

The moving of former votes to the Election results section is good. It's nice to see them all together in a section with the most recent. The History section can document significant changes in the riding and interesting details about the history of the area itself. DoubleBlue (Talk) 19:43, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The images you made are great as well. It's nice to see at a glance the shifts in voting in the polls. Good work! DoubleBlue (Talk) 19:44, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • This Bulkley Valley-Stikine happened to be relatively easy because the voting areas are labelled but most other districts are not. If they are unlabelled, then I cannot translate the 1996 results. One critism I have about the images is that I cannot show who the second place party is. A one vote difference between Lib and NDP, and a one vote difference between Lib and Reform (with NDP in last place) both up as Close Liberal. For the 2001 election the second place winner would be much more interesting (since Liberals pretty much swept most areas). The GIS program I am using is very basic (its free) and doesn't allow for detailed analysis (ie. colour ramp) and data input would take a massive amount of time.-maclean25 00:33, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bulkley Valley-Stikine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:05, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Bulkley Valley-Stikine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:26, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]