Talk:Canadian idealism

Philosophy: Social and political / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Social and political philosophy
	Contemporary philosophy

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted on 18 November 2013 by reviewer DGG (talk · contribs).

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Rmeynell (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

This page was proposed for deletion by Cezna (talk · contribs) on 13 December 2023 with the comment:
This concept does not have significant coverage, as the term only appears online in Meynell's book (this article's only source) and PhD thesis. Contemporary scholarly reviews rejected the idea that this was a distinct concept. Meynell also seems to be the creator and main author of this article.
It was contested by Kvng (talk · contribs) with the comment:
... consider merge or redirect to British idealism as preferred WP:ATD

Distinctly Canadian?

It seems that the word "this" in "three pillars to this philosophy" refers to Hegelian Idealism, rather than Canadian Idealism. Are we to infer then that the word "Canadian" simply means "Hegelian Idealism as found in Canada" rather than anything truly constituting a "philosophical tradition"? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 00:58, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In fact the article on Philosophy in Canada explicitly says "There has since developed no particular "Canadian" school of philosophy. Rather, Canadian philosophers have reflected particular views of established European and later American schools of philosophical thought ...." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richardson mcphillips (talk • contribs) 02:33, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not a real philosophical tradition

It seems this tradition was just an idea proposed by a PhD student.

I can't find any use of the term "Canadian idealism" except Meynell's book, his PhD thesis it was based on, and this article.

Moreover, it seems that the book was never engaged with by other scholars, except to be rejected by early reviews (see especially Cooper, 2012 in Further Reading). And it seems that Meynell has not written much since this book's publication.

I think the article is misleading in its current form and should either be deleted or else substantially ammended. Cezna (talk) 21:56, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It also seems most of this article was written by the author who coined this term, and his book is the only reference in this article. Cezna (talk) 22:04, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]