Talk:Central Executive Committee (PAP)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Central Executive Committee (PAP) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Potential references

Singapore in 1985: Managing Political Transition and Economic Recession (The January 1 1985 transition that saw all members of the CEC changed except for LKY)
"Three orbits of leadership" covers many important early leaders

Requested move 5 December 2024

It has been proposed in this section that Central Executive Committee (PAP) be renamed and moved to PAP Central Executive Committee.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

Central Executive Committee (PAP) → PAP Central Executive Committee – Putting PAP in brackets is a bit odd. Am I the only one who thinks that? woo (talk) 03:05, 5 December 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Adumbrativus (talk) 04:01, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brackets are commonly used (and is among several methods recommended by policy) as a form of disambiguation, in this case from other central executive committees. So no, it’s not necessarily “odd”. S5A-0043^Talk 12:56, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just to clarify my stand, while I disagree with the reasoning proposed by the nominator (as in the current title is odd), I don't have a strong opinion on whether this article should be moved, not moved, or merged as proposed below. S5A-0043^Talk 13:07, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Singapore has been notified of this discussion. Feeglgeef (talk) 05:44, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, at a quick look at the used sources, Central Executive Committee/CEC is used on its own. CMD (talk) 07:31, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Given developments below, noting for the closer that my oppose relates to this page name as a standalone, and is not a comment either way on a possible merge. CMD (talk) 04:55, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support move but unsure of the best new title. PAP is highly ambiguous, see PAP#Organizations which also links to People's Action Party (disambiguation). So I'm thinking that we can do better than the current title. (CEC and Central Executive Committee are also ambiguous of course, that should perhaps go without saying but I said it anyway.) Andrewa (talk) 08:05, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How does the new proposed title address your concern? It shifts PAP, which you state is highly ambiguous, into an even more prominent position. A support exacerbates the issue you cite. CMD (talk) 06:04, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
True, we risk swapping one defective title for another. So I support doing something but believe that we can do better than PAP Central Executive Committee. Andrewa (talk) 08:23, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Merge with People's Action Party- there are too many things that are ambiguous. Just one PAP article is enough. Besides, CEC has been used by many parties, not just the PAP itself. Sculture65 (talk) 07:15, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Changed my initial pick from Support to Merge; one page is enough to detail PAP, much like other parties instead.
Merge with People's Action Party - Per Sculture65. I believe it is not long enough at the moment to justify a separate article. Also, a separate title titled History of People's Action Party's Central Executive Committee would be better further down the road. --~ JASWE (talk) 04:51, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]