Talk:Chastity piercing
 | Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 4 June 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
I noticed this article when it was vandalized. I am curious as to whether what this article currently describes is a hoax. Geo Swan (talk) 22:20, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
- No, this article as currently described is not a hoax. This piercing is used in the BDSM community, sometimes with an actual lock, sometimes with just a captive bead ring. As a BDSM practitioner and piercer I would really have liked to see more information about the safety implications of wearing this type of piercing. If you are going to wear a lock in the piercing, it should be made of a hypoallergenic substance and designed to be worn as body jewelry. Also, I think the picture of the pierced penis should be removed, as it clearly shows a typical padlock you can buy at a hardware store. A lock like the one shown this should NEVER be worn in a body piercing as infection and tissue necrosis can result. 184.78.162.36 (talk) 05:18, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
I don't think that picture should be there, I came here thinking it was something like a regular piercing in the ears. I really didn't want to see that pic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.215.88.150 (talk) 18:56, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Chastity piercing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718140105/http://yazka.com/anderson_2003.pdf to http://yazka.com/anderson_2003.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100602164708/http://www.hawaii.edu/hivandaids/Self-Reported_Characteristics_of_Women_and_Men_with_Intimate_Body_Piercings.pdf to http://hawaii.edu/hivandaids/Self-Reported_Characteristics_of_Women_and_Men_with_Intimate_Body_Piercings.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100603154142/http://www.hawaii.edu/hivandaids/Body%20Piercing%20%20%20Seductions%20and%20Medical%20Complications%20of%20a%20Risky%20Practice.pdf to http://www.hawaii.edu/hivandaids/Body%20Piercing%20%20%20Seductions%20and%20Medical%20Complications%20of%20a%20Risky%20Practice.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:48, 20 November 2016 (UTC)