This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia
Chetniks in the interwar period is within the scope of WikiProject Yugoslavia, a collaborative effort to improve the Wikipedia coverage of articles related to Yugoslavia and its nations. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.YugoslaviaWikipedia:WikiProject YugoslaviaTemplate:WikiProject YugoslaviaYugoslavia
That's the way the summary style is supposed to work, so I'd be supportive of a summary of this article at Chetniks. One good way of doing that is to use the lead of this article as the summary (assuming it is a good lead, I haven't looked at it), then cite it. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:16, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at this article's lead, I say scrap that idea for now. The section at Chetniks is pretty good, I'd leave it there for now while you work up this article, then summarise at Chetniks once this article is in good shape. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:18, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
