Talk:Christoph von Graffenried, 1st Baron of Bernberg

Untitled

The Christoph von Graffenried page is in need of a talk page. As it currently appears, the information on the Christoph von Graffenried page is riddled with errors. For instance, the opening sentence, "Christoph von Graffenried (1661-1743) led a group of Swiss and Palatine Germans to North Carolina in 1710, and later authored Relation of My American Project, an account of this unsuccessful attempt to settle in the New World" must certainly come as a surprise to the thousands of descendants of Christoph von Graffenried, also known as Christopher deGraffenried, who are today productive citizens of the USA. Many members of the deGraffenried family in America have researched genealogical records that confirm Christopher deGraffenried as their ancestor. A number of deGraffenried family groups are active online, and readily available evidence reveals that many deGraffenried descendants are currently involved in genealogical research and a wide variety of other laudable life projects here. That Christopher deGraffenried's project was supposedly an "unsuccessful attempt to settle in the New World" must also come as a shock to the good citizens of New Bern, North Carolina, who have for a very long time labored under the impression that Christopher deGraffenried founded their fair city, and rightly so. New Bern, founded by Christoph von Graffenried in 1710, is the second oldest town in the state. Royal Governor William Tryon made the thriving seaport his colonial capital and in 1770 built there his residence, which still stands today, restored, as the centerpiece of the New Bern historical district. After the Revolutionary War, Tryon Palace in New Bern became the capitol of the state of North Carolina. So, though it certainly did not proceed according to his hopes, plans, and schedule (and what such project in the Americas or anywhere else ever did proceed according to plan?), Christoph von Graffenried's efforts can hardly be fairly or accurately described as a failure today.

The tone of the information provided on the current page strongly suggests a bias against Christoph von Graffenried and his project, and the content differs in many respects and details from readily available historical records and authors, including those cited. For instance, the statement ". . . Graffenried assumed the title 'Landgrave of Carolina'" would seem to suggest von Graffenried assumed the title under his own authority, while Vincent H. Todd's doctoral thesis, titled "Baron Christoph von Graffenried's New Bern Adventures" and dated 1913, which I located in Widener Library at Harvard University in 1989, leaves no doubt that ". . . one of the [Royal] proprietors, the Earl of Shaftsbury, had his friend, the philosopher John Locke, draw up a system of government for the colony . . ." and Christoph von Graffenried functioned as a Landgrave of Carolina under somewhat modified terms of that system. According to Todd, Christoph von Graffenried's "colony was the nearest approach to Locke's ideal that ever existed in this country--the only one founded on the Grand Model." Bias against von Graffenried is not evident in Todd's work: ". . . patrician though he was, Graffenried had the welfare of the colony at heart. The letters from the settlers express satisfaction with his administration and he seems to have regarded the title [Landgrave of Carolina] as of value only as it made the Carolinians respect him, and so benefitted his colony and company."

I will be proposing edits to the Christoph von Graffenried page based upon a more accurate reading and analysis of relevant historical records and documents.

Faithfully,

Michael Gillespie 14:02, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Christoph von Graffenried, 1st Baron of Bernberg/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

As it currently appears, the information on the Christoph von Graffenried page is riddled with errors. For instance, the opening sentence, "Christoph von Graffenried (1661-1743) led a group of Swiss and Palatine Germans to North Carolina in 1710, and later authored Relation of My American Project, an account of this unsuccessful attempt to settle in the New World" must certainly come as a surprise to the thousands of descendants of Christoph von Graffenried, also known as Christopher deGraffenried, who are today productive citizens of the USA. Many members of the deGraffenried family in America have researched genealogical records that confirm Christopher deGraffenried as their ancestor. A number of deGraffenried family groups are active online, and readily available evidence reveals that many deGraffenried descendants are currently involved in genealogical research and a wide variety of other laudable life projects here. That Christopher deGraffenried's project was supposedly an "unsuccessful attempt to settle in the New World" must also come as a shock to the good citizens of New Bern, North Carolina, who have for a very long time labored under the impression that Christopher deGraffenried founded their fair city, and rightly so. New Bern, founded by Christoph von Graffenried in 1710, is the second oldest town in the state. Royal Governor William Tryon made the thriving seaport his colonial capital and in 1770 built there his residence, which still stands today, restored, as the centerpiece of the New Bern historical district. After the Revolutionary War, Tryon Palace in New Bern became the capitol of the state of North Carolina. So, though it certainly did not proceed according to his hopes, plans, and schedule (and what such project in the Americas or anywhere else ever did proceed according to plan?), Christoph von Graffenried's efforts can hardly be fairly or accurately described as a failure today. The tone of the information provided on the current page strongly suggests a bias against Christoph von Graffenried and his project, and the content differs in many respects and details from readily available historical records and authors, including those cited. For instance, the statement ". . . Graffenried assumed the title 'Landgrave of Carolina'" would seem to suggest von Graffenried assumed the title under his own authority, while Vincent H. Todd's doctoral thesis, titled "Baron Christoph von Graffenried's New Bern Adventures" and dated 1913, which I located in Widener Library at Harvard University in 1989, leaves no doubt that ". . . one of the [Royal] proprietors, the Earl of Shaftsbury, had his friend, the philosopher John Locke, draw up a system of government for the colony . . ." and Christoph von Graffenried functioned as a Landgrave of Carolina under somewhat modified terms of that system. According to Todd, Christoph von Graffenried's "colony was the nearest approach to Locke's ideal that ever existed in this country--the only one founded on the Grand Model." Bias against von Graffenried is not evident in Todd's work: ". . . patrician though he was, Graffenried had the welfare of the colony at heart. The letters from the settlers express satisfaction with his administration and he seems to have regarded the title [Landgrave of Carolina] as of value only as it made the Carolinians respect him, and so benefitted his colony and company." When time allows, I will be proposing edits to the Christoph von Graffenried page based upon a more accurate reading and analysis of relevant historical records and documents. Faithfully, [[[User:Michael Gillespie|Michael Gillespie]] 22:24, 5 September 2007 (UTC)] 22:19, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Last edited at 22:24, 5 September 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 11:41, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Christoph von Graffenried. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070906005221/http://history.swissroots.org/179.0.html to http://history.swissroots.org/179.0.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:26, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Graffenried or von Graffenried?

Wiki Manual of Style is somewhat vague. Most of the major sources use Graffenried and I'm inclined to do the same. Glendoremus (talk) 03:55, 22 April 2021 (UTC)