Talk:Classless society

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Mid‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Social and political Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Social and political philosophy

Anarchism

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anarchism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anarchism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnarchismWikipedia:WikiProject AnarchismTemplate:WikiProject Anarchismanarchism articles

Anarchism WikiProject open tasks
watch · edit · history · talk · purge

Recognized content · Drafts & requests · Subscribe · Member list · Resources · How can I help?

Did you know

19 Nov 2024 – Anarchism without adjectives (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Grnrchst (t · c); see discussion
15 Nov 2024 – Fagoppositionens Sammenslutning (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Grnrchst (t · c); see discussion
05 Nov 2024 – 1931 Barcelona rent strike (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Launchballer (t · c); see discussion
25 Oct 2024 – Voltairine de Cleyre (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Grnrchst (t · c); see discussion

Peer reviews

26 Oct 2024 – Lucy Parsons (talk · edit · hist) has been put up for PR by Mujinga (t · c); see discussion

Articles for creation

01 Oct 2024 – Draft:Donat Cherepanov (talk · edit · hist) submitted for AfC by Speedymagoo (t · c) was moved to Donat Cherepanov (talk · edit · hist) by Soman (t · c) on 15 Nov 2024

Cleanup (0) · Potentially related articles · Recent edits · Recent Commons images · Stub expansion project (514)

Anthropology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Classless society be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

[Untitled]

Nominated for deletion

This parts is not only unquoted, but pure propaganda. In old fashioned terms, we are all labor force (working class) if we dont own the company, or poorer class so that "classless society" is just higher wage gap in society. All studies of economical and social inequalities show that gap has widen, not shorten (e.g. Milanovic)

"The state of social classes in society today is disputed. If the actual development is taken by the discussion[citation needed], then western society has moved passed classes to a classless society[citation needed]." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rasvoja (talk • contribs) 21:52, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled Thread

i agree —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.230.55.50 (talk • contribs) 13:28, January 31, 2007

yes, this should indeed be merged... Wickedxjade 10:54, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Done, but it's not as seamless as it could be. Tocharianne 17:55, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Interwiki Advice

Added the note about the german wiki since I see that in neither does this article have a Marxism or other project template. If there is an existing tag for this purpose please use it instead. 74.78.162.229 (talk) 15:27, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lede Rewrite

The prior text was simple-minded, crude, distorting, etc. My heart sank a little when I saw the degree to which I'm a major contributor to this article. OTOH it was bouyed by the realization that except for the problem of education and all that it entails, we actually are pretty close right now. 72.228.150.44 (talk) 18:02, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also removed {{German|Klassenlose Gesellschaft|October 16, 2006}} from the references section, a survey of the interwiki links indicates this is by far the most substantial article ATM. Lycurgus (talk) 04:19, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OR Tag on Central Concept §

It's current position in mainspace is not Classless society (Marxism) so some discussion of the subject of the article from perspectives other than Marxism is appropriate. I didn't see anything meriting the tags especially and will remove if no further comment. 72.228.177.92 (talk) 18:33, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually went ahead and did a clean-up as noted in the edit log. 72.228.177.92 (talk) 18:41, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Current State

While I did clean the Classlessness §, didn't comprehensively address the other one. I'm already far and away the major contributor to this article so I didn't want to do the same for the other. FTR I am aware that it makes ignorant statements about Marxist theory in the first sentence of the first ¶ 72.228.177.92 (talk) 19:00, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Socialism

in my opinion socialism is not classless it is defined as a unequal distribution of money —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.238.167.85 (talk) 00:10, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing section

In the section titled Marxist Definition, the 2nd and 3rd paragraph do not seem to fit together. I thought that the second paragraph seemed inconclusive. Ninjastriker13 (talk) 19:53, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

further editing needed

'completed, as the productive forces burst their confinement in bourgeois society as they did those of feudal- and orientalism, and the contradiction of class society is finally resolved into a version of the prior classless state but at the much higher level of human development that would be in effect then.' — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.84.68.252 (talk) 02:21, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

John Major

may not have been the transformative leader that Thatcher or Blair were, but at least in British contexts this phrase is strongly associated with his regime. The article needs at least a mention if not a section on his use of the term and in what ways it differed from Marxism &c. — $Llywelyn II$ 18:31, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Social libertarianism?

How does this section elucidate left-libertarian ideas about a classless society? All it seems to contain right now are very general statements about the various currents in left-libertarianism and the relations between them, but nothing on what they have to say about the classless society, which is the topic of the article. Donjoe (talk) 13:37, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Classless society. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090609075437/http://www.mutualist.org/id32.html to http://www.mutualist.org/id32.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:53, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Scope

What topics are meant to be included in this article? Theories of how classless societies would/do function? Note that class society is covered as a section within social class. Since that article already covers the precepts of Marxist class theory, is this separate article not a duplication? For that article to be complete, it would have to cover any concepts of classess society covered in this overview article. It sounds like it would be best to redirect or merge this article there. czar 15:25, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]