This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
The prior photo is much clearer. In the new one, his eyes appear to be squinting and the smile looks forced or unnatural. You need to get consensus for this change. You made it, it was reverted - then you should have taken it to the talk page instead of putting it back without consensus. I suggest you seek a third opinion. MB05:17, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the feedback and actually bringing your reasoning to the talk page. Based on your feedback, I've added a different photo to the article where his eyes aren't squinting, and lacks a "forced" smile. Both of the photos are far more superior than a photo from four years ago, where his mouth is agape making the subject look even more unflattering than having squinting eyes or a forced smile, but I'll go along with your argument. Also, I previously added the original un-cropped version of the photo in the relevant "Goldwater Institute" section, so having the same photo in the infobox and the article body would be very strange. Calibrador (talk) 05:30, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
