This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cooperatives, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CooperativesWikipedia:WikiProject CooperativesTemplate:WikiProject CooperativesCooperatives articles
Why does the article name have an abbreviation? Should it not be spelled out as "Ontario Co-operative Commonwealth Federation" or "Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (Ontario)"? I haven't seen this before and don't know whether there is a precedence for such usage. EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 11:52, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The name must include "Ontario Section" as that was the formal name. Don't know why it was moved last year to just "Ontario." Don't move it again unless there is a consensus.--Abebenjoe (talk) 06:14, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A basic rule of Wikipedia is verifiability. When adding new material, please use reliable sources and inline citations. In the case of the InfoBox, if the person is either mentioned in the article as having attained the specific position, or that information exists in their article, in verifiable form, than include it. If not, don't include it.--Abebenjoe (talk) 23:28, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]