This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Licences to sell liquor were issued only on certain terms which included the provision of food and overnight accommodation so breweries were obliged to establish chains of hotels (and their dining rooms) with very large "open plan" bars on the ground/basement floors to sell their beer. Cobb & Co was a rebranding exercise for New Zealand Breweries hotel dining rooms with (for a customer) little change beyond decor and adjustments to the near universal "menu" though those were briefly refreshing in themselves. Licensing laws changed in the 1980s and Cobb & Co died. Eddaido (talk) 03:14, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The vague "Timeline" section of their website says that in the 1970s "Lion Nathan Breweries opens the first Cobb & Co restaurant, which fed, showered, and sheltered the stagecoach passengers", which seems to be an embellishment. Stagecoaches in Auckland in 1973?? --Muzilon (talk) 07:43, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I think it means at an unknown date between 1860s and 1970s and maybe a forerunner of Lion Nathan did do that before the stagecoaches disappeared. I guess they hope nobody will get around to "reading the fine print" or even thinking about what's being said. Have you watched the training video? Eddaido (talk) 11:30, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
There's one good thing about that video, the star probably looks nothing like that now, well, I hope for his sake that is so! Eddaido (talk) 02:36, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Eddaido: on a separate matter: you queried whether Cobb & Co is really NZ's oldest restaurant chain. Although several sources do state this, it got me thinking and doing some digging. It is possible that Tony's is a rival to this claim, since they apparently opened their first restaurant in Auckland in 1963. So, I have changed the wording to "New Zealand's oldest family restaurant," which I don't think is disputed. Muzilon (talk) 02:06, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'd be most comfortable if you inserted the word surviving (or an equivalent) before family. For example Adams Bruce used to have shops[1] selling chocolates and ice cream and cake and providing tea rooms throughout the country in surprisingly small towns[2][3] not that they could be described as equivalent to Cobb & Co just that there have been many food organisations around here before, er, 1960 and I doubt you'll find a historian specialising in the subject who can be certain. Eddaido (talk) 02:41, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No, (seriously North American that) but it was a place where socially aware but not necessarily prosperous women of all ages met for tea or/and lunch, any males present would have felt miserable. The chocolates were pretty special and remained available long after the chain closed, the cake even longer.
Longest running, no. I should think it flourished (for barely a decade?) until owner tired of putting cash in. The name, I gather, is technically still alive in remote places. I don't think the name could have much value but I'm not in that business am I! Regards, Eddaido (talk) 05:15, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Two things. I'm sorry, I didn't notice your link to ice cream history, I came back to sort of underline that I didn't mean to suggest there was any similarity except food — well tea and sandwiches (and yes ice cream too if you wanted it).
Ice-cream parlour is I guess a natural conclusion for perhaps a North American reading that item. If you follow what I mean the item is About ice cream and not interested in a balanced view of the rest of the business. Cheers, Eddaido (talk) 09:46, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]