Talk:Commonwealth Franchise Act 1902

Australia: Law / Politics Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Commonwealth Franchise Act 1902 is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian law (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as High-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Zealand: Politics / Māori Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Māori task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Commonwealth Franchise Act 1902. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://psephos.adam-carr.net/countries/a/australia/1913/summary1913.txt
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050716074858/http://www.foundingdocs.gov.au/item.asp?sdID=88 to http://www.foundingdocs.gov.au/item.asp?sdID=88

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:31, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Commonwealth Franchise Act 1902. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050718105814/http://www.aph.gov.au/library/intguide/pol/women/women.htm to http://www.aph.gov.au/library/intguide/pol/women/women.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:49, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Revision of article

Hello all

I have made substantial revisions of this article. I have replaced a number of unsourced editorial comments and other information with sourced information. I have summarised information on the White Australia policy in order to better focus the article on the Act itself. I have provided a link to the main article on the White Australia policy where the details of this policy can be found. I have changed the headings to better reflect the contents of the article. I have also reduced repetitious information and moved some information to a more logical place. I have edited the lead to make it a more concise summary of the key points of the article. Happy to discuss. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 01:54, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Female suffrage

Hello all

I have removed the following statement because it appears to be a dubious editorial comment and is not supported by the cited sources. "The Act meant that, though the Colony of New Zealand had granted women universal suffrage in 1893 and this carried forward to New Zealand subsequently becoming an independent nation in 1907, Australia was the first independent country to grant 'white' women's suffrage at a national level, and the first country to allow women to stand for Parliament." There is no doubt that New Zealand introduced female suffrage before Australia. The question of when New Zealand and Australia became "independent countries" is debatable. In 1902 Australia was far from an independent country. Australians were British subjects and Britain ran Australia's foreign policy and defence. Australia was a self-governing member of the British Empire, and probably didn't become a fully independent nation until WWII. Happy to discuss. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 03:49, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tollefsen et al and Swain et al are not used as sources for the claim about women's suffrage, but about the disqualification of the indigenous and several other groups. This edit moves the sources from the right sentence to a wrong one.[1] Thenightaway (talk) 10:20, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. I can't see any source for the claim that Australia was the first independent country to introduce women's suffrage so I have removed it. I can restore Tollefsen et al and Swain as sources about the racial exclusions, but that statement is already well sourced in the article and not at all controversial. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 12:31, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]