Talk:Competency evaluation (law)

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Competency evaluation (law) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 October 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that a person must be deemed competent to receive the death penalty in order to be executed, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Ford v. Wainwright?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/October.

Wikipedia

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Competency evaluation (law). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070820133401/http://mimh200.mimh.edu/mimhweb/pie/reports/MIMH%20policybrief06-03.pdf to http://mimh200.mimh.edu/mimhweb/pie/reports/MIMH%20policybrief06-03.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:33, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Competence more broadly

Hello editors,

In reviewing this page, I believe we can adjust our perspective about competency, as it is much more than competence to stand trial. Competency can be very broadly defined as “sufficient ability” and therefore can be applied to a variety of situations (see: Weaver, C. M., & Meyer, R. G. (2019). Law and mental health: A case-based approach. Guilford Publications). This page regarding the idea of competence is framed more broadly (at least slightly) and I believe this page about evaluation and assessment of competency should follow-suit.

There are legal competencies ("legal" in terms of legal consequences regarding that competency decision) more than just in relating to criminal trials and outcomes. Some of these may be competence to refuse medical treatment, competence to retain guardianship, competence to make a will, and competence to consent to research. Likewise, there are more areas of competency related to criminal proceedings (e.g., competence to exercise the right to silence, competence to be sentenced, competence to testify,

Therefore I believe it is necessary to adjust this page's initial definition of competency, separate from competence to stand trial, and elaborate on other areas of competence. Esaiter (talk) 18:46, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Competence assessment tools

Hello editors,

In reviewing the distinction between this page and the boarder competence page, I believe that one way to distinguish this unique page's contribution would be to add a section that discusses various competency evaluation tools, such as the MacCAT-CA and others. What do we think about adding this section? Esaiter (talk) 23:15, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Advanced Forensic Psychology

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 August 2022 and 10 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lsobrils (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Lsobrils (talk) 21:29, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]