Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Connecticut Route 34

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposed merge with Oak Street Connector

[edit]

The Oak Street Connector is entirely part of Connecticut Route 34 Dough4872 02:58, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The information about the connector can easily be a part of the expanded history of the CT 34 article. I do not see this as a convincing enough argument. Dough4872 15:33, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There are entire books written just about the Oak Street Connector so I disgree with your assessment. Who decides how to proceed in this case when there is disagreement then? --Polaron | Talk 15:37, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Connecticut Route 34. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:40, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]