Talk:Constant purchasing power accounting

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Accounting task force.

A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Stfg, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on 22 August 2012. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining!

Translation of CPPA article into Afrikaans

Konstante Koopkragrekeningkunde on the Afrikaans Wikipedia [1].

I am busy doing the translation over time.

PennySeven (talk) 12:01, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

The two main problems are:

Article does not follow Manual of Style guidelines, especially about what should be in the lead, and about what should be in Bold (ie. only that article name and synonyms should be bolded).
The references need to be cleaned up and properly templated. Citations to books and long manuals need page numbers.

LK (talk) 10:00, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling mistake - Purchasig

{{Editprotected}} "in units of Constant Purchasig Power" should be "in units of Constant Purchasing Power" Brainman365 (talk) 14:58, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thank you for pointing that out. JRSpriggs (talk) 18:40, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No move.(non-admin closure) jcc (tea and biscuits) 20:01, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Constant purchasing power accounting → Capital Maintenance in Units of Constant Purchasing Power – (1) The article is almost 100% about Capital Maintenance in Units of Constant Purchasing Power and not about Constant Purchasing Power Accounting. (2) The Accountancy box that appears on the right of the page and in many other related articles contains the name and link Capital Maintenance in Units of Constant Purchasing Power. SpikeLimmigan (talk) 18:00, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose – the proposed name has wrong capitalization, and no argument based on sources has been used to indicate that we need such a long title. Sources include things like "Current purchasing power accounting method is variously known as current purchasing power accounting (CPPA), constant purchasing power accounting (CPPA), general price level accounting ...". Dicklyon (talk) 22:52, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Constant purchasing power accounting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:08, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]