Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Cope

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Use by deacon

[edit]

The article says: "It (i.e. the Cope) is now the vestment assigned to the celebrant, whether priest or bishop, for almost all functions in which the chasuble is not used, for example in processions, in the greater blessings and consecrations, at the solemnly celebrated Liturgy of the Hours, in giving Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament, and the celebration of other sacraments outside of Mass." Is it worn by a Deacon who does these where allowed? Richardson mcphillips1 (talk) 20:09, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The cope can be worn by a deacon as it is a vestment proper to all ranks of clergy. The cope can be worn when the deacon is the celebrant or assistant for the solemn recitation for the Divine Office. Deacons also may wear the cope for processions. This information could be included in the article, but the use of the cope by a deacon is very rarely seen today. Dgf32 (talk) 19:49, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sorry

[edit]

sorry, I posted a question, then saw the answer was in the text, then when I tried to remove the question I accidentally removed everything from the page. My apologies. Richardson mcphillips1 (talk) 20:12, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The previous data is now restored MishaPan (talk) 21:15, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thank you.Richardson mcphillips1 (talk) 19:13, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Patriarch of Jerusalem

[edit]

First, why is a firman of a non-existent state "unalterable"? Would the other religious communities really mind if he didn't use it, as long as he stuck to his own territory at the appointed time? And second, what "anomaly" is evident? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 21:54, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vangheluwe picture

[edit]

This man has brought the Church into very great disrepute through the paedophilic abuse of his nephews, and through the cover-ups which protected him to the extent of making prosecution impossible. The Church seems still to be protecting him, which is more than somewhat scandalous.

Is it right, therefore, that he be taken as an exemplar in any shape or form for what constitutes ecclesiastical activities? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.220.152.171 (talk) 00:34, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Cope/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Very comprehensive, but there's that first-person in the history and the general lack of references. Daniel Case 05:22, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 05:22, 21 April 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 12:15, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cope. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:04, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]