Talk:Criticism of Confucius Institutes
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Criticism of Confucius Institutes article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Confucius Institute was copied or moved into Concerns and controversies over Confucius Institutes with this edit on 01:01, 10 July 2011. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
LOL
[edit]If the bigots in the West can't stomach Chinese culture, they start calling it "propaganda." Much like Red Scare and other West-originated mass paranoia. 71.31.30.66 (talk) 14:35, 7 September 2019 (UTC) Communist dog, your ideology has killed millions. How can you live with yourself? How can you parrot the lies of a government that does more to repress Chinese people than any western one? You should be ashamed. But most of all you should be grateful that this is a Western-originated site whoch actually permits you to spew your bile instead of reporting you to the government so that it can imprison and ‘reeducate’ you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8802:5700:E2E:75C2:C3EE:7642:6408 (talk) 08:42, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- B-Class Linguistics articles
- Low-importance Linguistics articles
- B-Class applied linguistics articles
- Applied Linguistics Task Force articles
- WikiProject Linguistics articles
- B-Class China-related articles
- Low-importance China-related articles
- B-Class China-related articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject China articles