Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Culmer White

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

What is the importance of this lifeboat? I am strongly considering proposing deletion. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 03:31, 6 June 2006 (UTC) From the information given, of historical significance--its a class of boat, not a boat. Added unsourced tag.DGG 02:06, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://arthurmicklethwaite.htmlplanet.com/boatmans_tales_by_S_Holbourn/A_Boatmans_tales_S_Holbourns_study_of_lifeboat_rescues_shipwrights_and_local_families_02.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:09, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: while archive.org does not have versions of that page going back to 2004, it's clear that the content was already on the site in 2003. The curious typography and illiterate "it's" are also convincing. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:09, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]