Talk:Cultural history
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Old talk
[edit]If merged, the entry should remain titled "Cultural History". This is a significant area of study, significant enough to have a page of its own. I am not familiar enough with archaeology to say if it should remain as its own page. Nimby 17:58, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Agreed - cultural history should have its own page - or at least be merged with History! Mjs110
Cultural history should NOT be merged with culture-history archaeology. In archaeology, culture history refers to a paradigm in the history of the discipline (late 19th-mid20th century, between Antiquarianism and Processual Archaeology). This meaning is completely unrelated to the other definition of cultural history. The name of the archaeology entry could be changed to "culture-historical archaeology" or "culture history", but combining it with "cultural history" makes no sense.
The name of the "culture-history archaeology" page would more accurately titled "cultural-historical archaeology". Cultural history should NOT be merged with cultural-historical archaeology. Cultural-historical archaeology is the term used to describe a theoretical approach that archaeologists from western culture traditions adopted in the late 19th - mid 20th centuries. In the United States the cultural-historical paradigm focused on the archaeological culture rather than on developmental stages of cultures, as the previous cultural evolution paradigm had. 168.103.165.246 22:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC) An American Archaeologist
the american archaeologist is absolutely right! culture-history archaeology should be re-named and both pages should most definitely not be merged. Cultural History is in History a reaction against the ways scientists like cultural- historical archaeologist thought.Bobenkate 15:12, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Kulturgeschichte
[edit]I'm not sure why "RepublicanJacobite" can't grasp my point, but the assertion that cultural history is "(from the German term Kulturgeschichte)" is nonsense and should be deleted. 152.1.191.173 (talk) 18:05, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- The deletion of material, with a very vague edit summary, is bad form. That is why we have this talk page, so that discussion can occur and a decision can be reached. Your approach, though, is not constructive. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 18:09, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- Seemed pretty constructive to me! 152.1.191.173 (talk) 18:19, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
How rock 'n roll started
[edit]. 85.185.58.88 (talk) 18:25, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Women in American History
[edit]This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 September 2024 and 18 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MayriCarli (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by MayriCarli (talk) 18:40, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in History
- C-Class vital articles in History
- C-Class history articles
- Mid-importance history articles
- WikiProject History articles
- C-Class culture articles
- Top-importance culture articles
- WikiProject Culture articles
- C-Class Tourism articles
- Mid-importance Tourism articles
- WikiProject Travel and Tourism articles
- C-Class Anthropology articles
- Mid-importance Anthropology articles