Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Customer intelligence

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dicdef

[edit]

What is Dicdef? The word is not hypertexted and I can not find the explanation at this site.

Wikipedia is not a dictionary. MER-C 13:25, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki guru, please remove the warning from the article and...

[edit]

kindly make some editing so that it won't die.

I do not intend to...

[edit]

make the article dic-entry like. It is expanding...

For God sake....

[edit]

the page is saved :-)

BTW, how to make the article searchable?

I have seen one of OI's techs on the net which is about Kraft's P&L calculation. Would someone out there please kindly create the relevant article?

Can we compare to CIS - Customer Information System? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.58.152.238 (talk) 18:10, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wiki-regulator....

[edit]

I have located the article to the associated categories and welcome to inspect it. If it's OK, please remove the relevant warnings.

[edit]

I've tested reference links 1 to 3 and they're all out dated or broken links! please correct them Mkiaeeha (talk) 19:39, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Customer intelligence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:42, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019 references

[edit]

Coming to the article I observed a single reference. isbn 978-1-898085-33-1. A search within it seemed not to find a single mention of "Customer intelligence". I happened to observe [1] removed about 5 references as opposed to attempting to recover them or marking them as dead links (one of which was a valid archived version). Concerned I therefore recovered those links from archives. The fact I have recovered these links does not mean I endorse them or say they are appropriate and are non promotional; in fact I have concerns on a couple and they were as far as I can tell possible placed by a blocked user who was previously in good standing. I may mark a source verification on some of the references. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 14:46, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]