Talk:Cyclone Jokwe

Cyclone Jokwe has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 19, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 11, 2008.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Cyclone Jokwe killed 16 people in Mozambique and left at least 55,000 homeless?

Weather: Tropical / Southern Hemisphere Mid‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Southern Hemisphere work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Submission

Just a small heads-up, but it appears that Jokwe's name was submitted by Botswana.[1] Hurricane Angel Saki My own personal NHC 08:29, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

WP:Good article usage is a survey of the language and style of Wikipedia editors in articles being reviewed for Good article nomination. It will help make the experience of writing Good Articles as non-threatening and satisfying as possible if all the participating editors would take a moment to answer a few questions for us, in this section please. Would you like any additional feedback on the writing style in this article? If you write a lot outside of Wikipedia, what kind of writing do you do? Is your writing style influenced by any particular WikiProject or other group on Wikipedia? At any point during this review, let us know if we recommend any edits, including markup, punctuation and language, that you feel don't fit with your writing style. Thanks for your time. - Dan Dank55 (talk) 15:59, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. The survey will end on April 30. - Dan Dank55 (talk) 20:49, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I always enjoy feedback on my writing. Personally, I just write and hope it's good, so I like changes to the article, as well as recommended changes. Outside of Wikipedia, the only form of writing I do is songwriting. My writing style has developed since I joined Wikipedia back in 2006, so I'd say it has been my involvement with the tropical cyclone Wikiproject that has assisted in the development of my writing. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
I'll pass writing, but I'd like to see numbers agree with the MoS. Not a big deal, as only one number is such
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
I'd like some more non-newspaper impact sources, but they'll do.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Excellent images
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Overal, an excellent article. There is one number above 10 that is spelled out, which doesn't agree with the MoS, but it's not major enough to affect the article. Thus, I'm happy to say that the article Passes GA. Good work on improving this article to GA status. Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 00:51, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Cyclone Jokwe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://metocph.nmci.navy.mil/jtwc/warnings/sh2208web.txt
Corrected formatting/usage for http://205.85.40.22/jtwc/warnings/sh2208web.txt
Corrected formatting/usage for https://metocph.nmci.navy.mil/jtwc/warnings/sh2208web.txt

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:41, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]