Talk:DAMP Project

Military history: Technology / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Ship photo

Added the ship photo taken at Ascension Island in circa 1962. The ship is a personal photo which also appears at NavSource.

NavSource has authorized me to use my photos that appear in NavSource to appear in Wikipedia. (See DISCUSSION under USAS American Mariner where agreement by NavSource Editor Gary Priolo is shown.)Wikited (talk) 19:41, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

crypto communications aboard DAMP

Judging only by the dates, the primary crypto communications equipment aboard was likely KO-6 and KW-26, both declassified now. All 1960s crypto equipment is obsolete (and primitive in comparison to what is around today) The problem with trying to write about any of it for Wikipedia is that there are no reliable or objective references available because it was so secret. Even declassified NSA documents are so heavily redacted that they are useless (for purposes of documenting an encyclopedic article).Anewcharliega (talk) 19:23, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on DAMP Project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070407064829/http://www.darpa.mil/body/arpa_darpa.html to http://www.darpa.mil/body/arpa_darpa.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:24, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on DAMP Project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060825225731/http://www.hawaii.navy.mil/PMRF/PMRF_RangeSites.htm to http://www.hawaii.navy.mil/PMRF/PMRF_RangeSites.htm
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.navsource.org/archives/09/5312.htmUSAS

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:12, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Citations Needed

Cielquiparle, hi… I noticed you added a note template about needing inline citations. As a comment on your edit, you said the article has “extensive sources”… But looking for the references or bibliography, there is only one (single) book listed. How is that “extensive” sourcing? The See Also and External Links don’t really count as sources. Thoughts? — TadgStirkland⁴⁰¹ (Tadg^Talk) 05:53, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK have changed tag accordingly. Cielquiparle (talk) 05:56, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect. This last change you made is a great compromise. Thank you very much. — TadgStirkland⁴⁰¹ (Tadg^Talk) 13:10, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]