Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Daniel M'Naghten

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Update

[edit]

I've taken the liberty of trying to rationalise this page, M'Naghten Rules, and Insanity defense so they they can all be inter-consistent without unnecessary duplication. So I've made some minor changes here, and major ones (ongoing) in M'Naghten Rules, and will be dealing with Insanity defense shortly. Any comments, please let me know. --Rodhullandemu 03:41, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

I have moved some items from bibliography to footnotes, and taken out a couple that seem to duplicate references or not be particularly relevant. I wondered if anyone had read this one and if it has something that can be put in the text? Parker, C.S. (ed.) (1891-9) Sir Robert Peel: From His Private Papers, 3 vols.Southdevonian (talk) 17:45, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Screenplay

[edit]

I have removed this unsourced text

A screenplay about the M'Naghten case and aftermath ("In the Broad Face of Day" - 2011) was written by J. T. Dalby and R. D. Schneider, two experts on the case - see American International Film Festival (March 2011) and others.

as it appears to be an unpublished screenplay. If it gets turned into a film that would be great and certainly worth putting into the article. Alternatively, if anyone can find a published source (not a promotional website) with something about the screenplay then it could be mentioned. Meanwhile both authors have works listed in the further reading section.Southdevonian (talk) 18:09, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All screenplays are unpublished - the most they are is registered - which this one is. Simple google search will find it in various sources. Because of this listing it has been solicited for stage adaptation. This is not a private website - if you want to clean up this site why not get rid of some of the clearly absurd material that has no support. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.146.92.231 (talk) 16:35, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It will need a source. It is really up to the editor who puts text in to provide a source. I would have been prepared to put in a reference for you, but when I googled it I couldn't find any published sources. A local newspaper or university newsletter would do, if you know of one (but not the authors' webpage). Southdevonian (talk) 20:06, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shooting

[edit]

I have changed the section title from Peel assassination attempt to shooting of Edward Drummond. People have speculated that it was a case of mistaken identity; a few lines further down the article mentions this. But the fact remains that the prime minister wasn't in the area; it was Drummond who was shot; and Daniel Macnaughten never admitted to having intended to assassinate Peel. Southdevonian (talk) 15:05, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]