Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:David Stringer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 2019 Charges

[edit]

It should be noted that the charges were possibly salacious, given the circumstances and the lack of prosecution, plus the agreement to expunge. Such is a common tactic when the prosecution has a weak or no case at all, yet refuses to drop the case for political reasons.

Please don't block me, this is a legit charge. Remove if necessary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.194.73.233 (talk) 12:39, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[1]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by N7ekg (talkcontribs) 06:37, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The source in the main article does reference the site above, and it is noted in the main article that the charges were expunged. You could make the case that there should be more emphasis placed on the subject's narrative regarding the dropped charges. Do you have proposed verbiage in mind? saguarosallytalk 01:39, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

Is he married?, or has he ever been married?

[edit]

Is he married?, or has he ever been married?