Talk:Dead Pony
Dead Pony is currently a Music good article nominee. Nominated by Launchballer at 12:14, 10 July 2024 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page. Note: Co-nominated with Georgeykiwi Short description: Scottish pop punk band |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Dead Pony appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 August 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Page development
[edit]Hey @Launchballer! Saw these guys live the other day and have improved their article to get from draft to mainspace, fancy giving me a hand to expand & improve? Have added an image to the page and some general info and referenced some decent articles. Thanks again! George (talk) 16:50, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 23:22, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- ... that Dead Pony (vocalist pictured) renamed themselves after a track expressing how they felt after being told that Santa Claus was fictional? Source: https://www.thelineofbestfit.com/new-music/discovery/dead-pony-everything-is-easy
Launchballer 12:03, 10 July 2024 (UTC).
- Article moved to mainspace within 7 days. Article is adequately sourced with inline citations, Earwig detects no issues with copyvio. QPQ provided. Nice work. B3251(talk) 17:25, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Age?
[edit]Why is it so hard to find the age of these persons? 75.246.220.29 (talk) 09:15, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Dead Pony/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Launchballer (talk · contribs) 12:14, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Ganesha811 (talk · contribs) 02:04, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi! I'll be reviewing this article using the template below. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask them here. —Ganesha811 (talk) 02:04, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | ||
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | ||
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. |
| |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
| |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. |
| |
7. Overall assessment. |
- Good article nominees
- Good article nominees on review
- Biography articles of living people
- B-Class biography articles
- B-Class biography (musicians) articles
- Low-importance biography (musicians) articles
- Musicians work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class Scotland articles
- Low-importance Scotland articles
- All WikiProject Scotland pages
- B-Class Rock music articles
- Low-importance Rock music articles
- WikiProject Rock music articles
- B-Class Women in music articles
- Low-importance Women in music articles
- WikiProject Women in Music articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles