Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Dead Pony

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Page development

[edit]

Hey @Launchballer! Saw these guys live the other day and have improved their article to get from draft to mainspace, fancy giving me a hand to expand & improve? Have added an image to the page and some general info and referenced some decent articles. Thanks again! George (talk) 16:50, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 23:22, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Shields performing in London in 2024
Anna Shields performing in London in 2024
Moved to mainspace by Launchballer (talk) and Georgeykiwi (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 238 past nominations.

Launchballer 12:03, 10 July 2024 (UTC).[reply]


Age?

[edit]

Why is it so hard to find the age of these persons? 75.246.220.29 (talk) 09:15, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Dead Pony/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Launchballer (talk · contribs) 12:14, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Ganesha811 (talk · contribs) 02:04, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Hi! I'll be reviewing this article using the template below. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask them here. —Ganesha811 (talk) 02:04, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
2c. it contains no original research.
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
  • Earwig picks up the box quote and some review phrases, but all attributed and quoted properly in article. Hold for manual spot check.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
  • All good, Flickr confirmed, pass.
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
  • Both images work well, no issues. Pass.
7. Overall assessment.