Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Declared monuments of Hong Kong

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Declared"

[edit]

Who are they "declared" by? Stevage 10:06, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They are declared ones by ones by Hong Kong Government since 1960s. I believe more historic building/structure, etc will be "declared' For more information, pls refer to http://www.amo.gov.hk/ Shrimp wong 04:22, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hong Kong stamp (Tang Lung Chau Lighthouse).JPG Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Hong Kong stamp (Tang Lung Chau Lighthouse).JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:48, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How about Kang Yung Study Hall, Sheung Wo Hang Sha Tau Kok?

[edit]

Kang Yung Study Hall, Sheung Wo Hang Sha Tau Kok 219.78.114.248 (talk) 15:22, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, found it, sorry. 219.78.114.248 (talk) 23:21, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Cenotaph

[edit]

Hello, this is Thomas Park. I think the current image of the Cenotaph has low quality, so I uploaded my image. If you think it is not appropriate edit, please let me know by leaving message on my talk page or typing @ + my username, so I can notice easily.

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Declared monuments of Hong Kong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:57, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Declared monuments of Hong Kong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:43, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redundancy in layout

[edit]

The "Location" column sometimes has the GPS coordinates of the monument, and there's also a separate column for "Coordinates" as well. What's the point of having duplicate data?

Additionally, most of the "Description" fields are blank, while a minority have a one sentence summary of the monument. The "Description" fields should either be populated, or the entire column removed. At the very least, they should be populated for monuments which have no mentions elsewhere in Wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by MowerBreeze (talkcontribs) 06:35, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]