Talk:Declared monuments of Hong Kong

Hong Kong Top‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

Top

This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (25)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (58) • B-Class articles (284)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (998)

Image needed (344)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,345) • Stub-Class articles (6,691)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (403) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,260)

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Hau Wong#Hong Kong|Yeung Hau Temple]] Anchor Hau Wong#Hong Kong links to a specific web page: Hong Kong. The anchor (#Hong Kong) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

"Declared"[edit]

Who are they "declared" by? Stevage 10:06, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They are declared ones by ones by Hong Kong Government since 1960s. I believe more historic building/structure, etc will be "declared' For more information, pls refer to http://www.amo.gov.hk/ Shrimp wong 04:22, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hong Kong stamp (Tang Lung Chau Lighthouse).JPG Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Hong Kong stamp (Tang Lung Chau Lighthouse).JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:48, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How about Kang Yung Study Hall, Sheung Wo Hang Sha Tau Kok?[edit]

Kang Yung Study Hall, Sheung Wo Hang Sha Tau Kok 219.78.114.248 (talk) 15:22, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, found it, sorry. 219.78.114.248 (talk) 23:21, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Cenotaph[edit]

Hello, this is Thomas Park. I think the current image of the Cenotaph has low quality, so I uploaded my image. If you think it is not appropriate edit, please let me know by leaving message on my talk page or typing @ + my username, so I can notice easily.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Declared monuments of Hong Kong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130922201512/http://www.lcsd.gov.hk/ce/Museum/Monument/form/Brief_Information_on_proposed_Grade_III_Items.pdf to http://www.lcsd.gov.hk/ce/Museum/Monument/form/Brief_Information_on_proposed_Grade_III_Items.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:57, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Declared monuments of Hong Kong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:43, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redundancy in layout[edit]

The "Location" column sometimes has the GPS coordinates of the monument, and there's also a separate column for "Coordinates" as well. What's the point of having duplicate data?

Additionally, most of the "Description" fields are blank, while a minority have a one sentence summary of the monument. The "Description" fields should either be populated, or the entire column removed. At the very least, they should be populated for monuments which have no mentions elsewhere in Wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by MowerBreeze (talk • contribs) 06:35, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]