Talk:Definitions of philosophy
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Manual of Style[edit]
This article is written in a personalized language that's incompatible with an encyclopedia.
Examples:
'...This is an important achievement...' (who judges it important?)
'...the problem with such general characterizations...' (who judges it general?)
'...they are usually too vague...' (who judges it too vague?)
'...they apply not just to philosophy but also to some non-philosophical disciplines...' (who's making this claim? which non-philosophical disciplines?)
'...thereby fail to distinguish philosophy from them...' (says who?)