Talk:Delaware Route 62

Delaware Route 62 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 10, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

U.S. Roads: State highways / Delaware Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	Delaware
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

United States: Delaware Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Delaware portal This article is supported by WikiProject Delaware (assessed as Mid-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Delaware Route 62/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Imzadi1979 (talk · contribs) 16:34, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Dabs and ELs look good.

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Looks good.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Looks good as well.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Given the length of this highway, the content could be padded slightly with the AADT and NHS information.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
Rare to see otherwise in highway articles.
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
I fixed the caption for you because it wasn't a full sentence, it didn't need a period.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
I'm passing, but still recommending that the above suggestion be implemented. Imzadi 1979 → 17:19, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]