Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Development and discovery of SSRI drugs

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

NPOV for "What came after SSRIs?" section

[edit]

This section reads like a puff piece, and the timeline image contains information that might be more useful if it were incorporated into the body of the article. I don't edit very often, but I'm guessing that there's some sort of policy for dealing with edits that contain some useful encyclopedic content but violate NPOV enough to basically serve as ads for a product? Would it be reasonable to just delete the entire section, since the article is about SSRIs and not SNRIs? In the meantime I'm just going to edit it to sound less like ad copy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.16.165.159 (talk) 06:32, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

yes, that whole section should be deleted. It is copy-pasted from a drug-selling website. 2604:3D08:778A:2400:D805:6F28:D1C7:1713 (talk) 03:02, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Development and discovery of SSRI drugs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:45, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Development and discovery of SSRI drugs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:02, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

very biased

[edit]

seems very in favor of ssris 2600:1010:B056:BAD5:611A:597E:5176:66CB (talk) 21:59, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Reads like pharmaceutical company propaganda. Pupperpawz (talk) 20:48, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

3D structure of SERT

[edit]

In the Binding of SSRIs to SERT protein section, there is this interjected "Update" sentence:

The three-dimensional (3D) structure of SERT is not known and has been the main obstacle for elucidation of the structural mechanism of the human SERT. Update: X-ray crystallography data is available as of 2017 it seems (https://www.rcsb.org/structure/6AWO)...

Integrating the linked data and editing surrounding context based on that data is beyond my scope of knowledge, if anyone is able to fix that interjection. Kimen8 (talk) 22:33, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Modern research has disproved the chemical imbalance hypothesis

[edit]

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41380-022-01661-0.

The serotonin imbalance in the brain hypothesis has long since been debunked, but is referenced repeatedly in this article. The entire article should be re-written to no longer suggest that low activity or low levels of serotonin result in depression, and that SSRIs help by adjusting that balance: that is nonsense and fake science.

This entire article is a bloody advertisement for the pharmaceutical industry. What a joke! 2604:3D08:778A:2400:D805:6F28:D1C7:1713 (talk) 03:05, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]