Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Diamond Comic Distributors

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Claypool Comics

[edit]

There should be something about Diamond shutting down Claypool Comics. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 151.198.233.92 (talkcontribs) 20:08, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Maybe there should/could be something in this article about Diamond's treatment of small press companies in general. The "open door" policy mentioned in the article has recently changed, for example, with their recent refusal to carry comics that don't have bar codes.--MythicFox 11:11, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is related to the tumultuous story of how they gained their monopoly on distribution in the 1990's. It's kind of interesting, and is briefly mentioned on Marvel Comics. A lot of small press publishers were hurt by that, along with all of the other smaller distribution companies.69.95.235.140 (talk) 17:18, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sub companies

[edit]

Several of the companies, perhaps all, listed as divisions of Diamond are in fact separate companies owned by Geppi, not by Diamond. 66.31.78.14 (talk) 18:42, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

wth linking

[edit]

Why the heck is previews linked to this page?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.0.203.34 (talk) 03:44, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Previews is the name of an important comic book industry catalog published by Diamond Comic Distributors. Apparently, no other article on Wikipedia grabbed the namespace first. If we need to disambiguate, we can certainly do so, but for now I see no reason to change. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 06:17, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
its spam, plain and simple. "previews" is a general enough term that doesnt connote the diamond catalog. it should be changed to "previews (catalog)" --Tehw1k1 (talk) 06:41, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Current Anti-Trust Litigation

[edit]

Many comic book shop owners who have closed within the last decade are meeting and teaming up together to sue Diamond based on the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. Most of these guys don't use the Internet, but communicate by meeting each other. They have current hard-copy documents from the Justice Department looking at Diamond as a pyramid scheme. If you want further research, I suggest you get out and find a former owner of a comic shop and ask them why they closed their shop at a loss. All fingers will point back to Diamond's pyramid scheme. Coffee4binky (talk) 15:35, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

criticism of Diamond

[edit]

Blog of Boom! Studios includes a dig at Diamond about a 3% reorder penalty on backlist items. Commenentary about Boom move at http://comicsworthreading.com/2010/05/05/boom-steers-retailers-to-haven-distributors/ . Going to sleep now, tomorrow I will try to find criticism about Diamond raising minimum order amounts. --EarthFurst (talk) 13:18, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Diamond Comic Distributors. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:11, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Diamond Comic Distributors. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:13, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Very confusing outlining in this article

[edit]

I just stumbled on the article and wanted to add the news about DC's announcment, but this is filled with very confusing outlining that clearly needs to be fixed. The History section seems to go on past into the Publishing section. I'm moving the 2020 shutdown up to History and adding a note about DC's announcement afterwards. Bastique ☎ call me! 17:33, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Advertising

[edit]

this article is shows promotion of organizations and products, any suggestions on how to improve it. Mthiyane 2 (talk) 21:26, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the quotes in the "history" section seem like their purpose is to promote the founder's business decisions/strategies, so maybe remove those? LLWray (talk) 00:33, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]