Talk:Donald D. Clayton

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Physics: Biographies Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Biographies Taskforce.

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

--108.227.250.162 (talk) 13:01, 28 October 2013 (UTC)== comments by the subject Donald D. Clayton ==[reply]

Untitled

I am Donald D. Clayton, the 78-yr-old subject of this biographical article. I write to provide information that may be helpful to editors. This article was written and submitted by the wife of a close scientific colleague(whom I will not name). That submission was justified by my stature as an academic scientist; but I doubted that it was initially neutral enough, objective enough, or sufficiently documented to meet Wikipedia guidelines. So I edited it. I am not an editor, but I nonetheless edited the article many times, without login in as an editor. I edited as 108.227.250.162 My edits focused on four goals: 1. greatly increasing the verifiability by inserting citations of research publications or of documentation of the honors mentioned;(note: not being a Wiki editor, I may not have chosen the best formats for these, and a more professional editor could improve them) 2. improving the writing (syntax, word choices, precisely correct wording, professionalism, etc.); 3. making the prose more interesting and relevant to a general audience, both public and of scientific biography; 4. added links to historical photographs of my own, with accurate captions, posted on my own website for History of Nuclear Astrophysics and added Wikilinks to other Wiki articles of high relevance;

Speaking personally as the subject, I now find(Oct 17, 2013) the article to be well balanced and accurate. Therefore I do not expect to edit it further. I hope that Wiki procedures will now take over completely. However, being agreeable and well intentioned, I express here my willingness to help any editor clarify matters of fact or interpretation. One can query me at claydonald@gmail.com and I will reply truthfully and helpfully. But others should do the editing. There is no question but that this article will grow in importance in history of academic astrophysics in years to come. Donald D. Clayton — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.227.250.162 (talk) 22:13, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]