Talk:Dooo It!

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dooo It! article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Cannabis Low‑importance

	Cannabis portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cannabis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cannabis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CannabisWikipedia:WikiProject CannabisTemplate:WikiProject CannabisCannabis articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hip hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Miley Cyrus Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Miley Cyrus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Miley Cyrus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Miley CyrusWikipedia:WikiProject Miley CyrusTemplate:WikiProject Miley CyrusMiley Cyrus articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Revert

I revert this edit because the info was unsourced, but I am sharing here as a reminder to find sources that verify participation in the performance by these individuals. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 17:23, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish Wikipedia

The Spanish version of the article is expanded and includes artwork, if that helps. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:47, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

'New York Daily News' reliability discussion

The reliability of NY Daily News (as cited to explain the genre) is under dispute. A brief discussion is available at User_talk:130.218.6.168#October 2023. WP:RSP states that the source is generally reliable but can have exaggerated headlines. In my opinion, this is a reasonable use of the site as a source, especially since there is no other good source available from a brief Google search.

If someone can find a higher-quality source, I completely support changing it. Thriftycat (talk) 18:00, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Thriftycat: Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources says, "Most editors consider the content of New York Daily News articles to be generally reliable, but question the accuracy of its tabloid-style headlines." ---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:25, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Another Believer Does this mean it is permissible? I'm still new to this stuff, sorry. Thriftycat (talk) 15:48, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't see that you linked to RSP in your comment. I don't have a problem with the source being used in this instance, though I agree a replacement is appropriate if a better source exists. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:52, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks for weighing in Thriftycat (talk) 16:05, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]